Securities Regulation Committee Activity in Review
As published in the NY Business Law Journal:
Winter 2012 NY Business Law Journal
Securities Regulation Committee
The Securities Regulation Committee has continued its monthly meeting
programs addressing a wide range of matters of importance to securities
law practitioners. Our dinner meetings tend to foster lively
discussions, and afford Committee members an opportunity to discuss
“hot topics” with persons closely associated with them.
Since our last Committee report in the Summer 2012 journal, among the
topics presented at meetings were:
1. Social Media and the Securities Lawyer: A User’s Guide
2. Recent SEC Enforcement Activities and Current Initiatives
3. JOBS Act: Changes to the Capital Raising Process
4. Securities Enforcement: Insights from a Recent Former Prosecutor
5. FINRA Rules Update
6. Financial Regulatory Reform Update
7. Securities Arbitration
8. Effects of the JOBS Act on Marketing Activities of Private Investment
Funds
9. Confl icts of Interest and Other Ethics Issues in Private Equity
Funds
10. Capital Raising or Hair Raising: The Trials of JOBS (including an
analysis of the proposed rule to eliminate general solicitation)
11. Rational Boundaries for SEC Cost-Benefi t Analysis
12. CFTC & SEC Update: Clarifi cations to the End-User Exception to
Mandatory Clearing Requirements
and New Rules for Swap Participants
In addition, our Private Investment Funds Subcommittee held a meeting
in April 2012, titled “Unpacking New Form PF: What You Need to
Know, Now.” In June 2012, we had a meeting on “SEC Adviser
Examinations: Are You Ready?” At this meeting our speakers
included a former Director of the SEC’s Division of Investment
Management and an SEC Associate Director who currently heads the
National Investment Adviser/Investment Company Examination Program. The
Subcommittee closely tracks developments and emerging trends in the
private investment funds industry.
Furthermore, in October, the Committee submitted a comment letter to
the SEC on proposed rules Eliminating the Prohibition Against General
Solicitation/Advertising in Rule 506 and Rule 144A. Finally, two of our
members gave a presentation called “Capital Raising or Hair
Raising: The Trials of JOBS” at the Business Law Section Fall
Meeting held in Ithaca, NY.
For more information about, and how to join, the Securities
Regulation Committee and Private Investment Funds Subcommittee, go to
the website www.nysba.org/ SecuritiesRegulation or
www.nysba.org/PIF. We are also on LinkedIn at www.nysba.org/SecuritiesRegulation- LinkedIn
or www.nysba.org/PIFLinkedIn.
- Howard Dicker, Chair
Summer 2012 NY Business Law Journal
Securities Regulation Committee
The Securities Regulation Committee has continued its monthly meeting
programs addressing a wide range of matters of importance to securities
law practitioners. Our dinner meetings tend to foster lively
discussions, and afford Committee members an opportunity to discuss
“hot topics” with persons closely associated with them.
Since our last Committee report in the Winter 2011 issue of this
Journal, among the topics presented at meetings were:
1. Recent Accounting/Auditing Developments that Lawyers Need to
Know
2. The SEC’s New Rule on Large Trader Reporting and new Form 13H:
With Filing and Compliance Deadlines Looming – Are you ready?
3. What’s New From FINRA
4. Developments in PIPES, Registered Directs and Other Capital Raising
Techniques
5. ISS 2012 Proxy Voting Guidelines and Preparing for the Upcoming Proxy
Season
6. What You Don’t Know About OTC Markets (formerly known as Pink
Sheets)
7. Ethics Issues for Swap and Other Lawyers
8. Blue Sky and Investment Advisers 2012
9. Early Reports of the 2012 Proxy Season and Shareholder Activism:
Things are Heating Up
10. Crisis Communications: From FBI Raids to DWI
11. Crowfunding—making it easier for entrepreneurs to obtain
capital or for fraudsters to fleece grandma?
12. CFTC Final Rules Amend Commodity Pool Operator and Commodity Trading
Advisor Registration and Compliance Obligations: some exemptions
retained but more advisors will need to register
In addition, our Private Investment Funds Subcommittee held a meeting
in February 2012, which I titled the “Alphabet Soup of Forms For
Investment Advisers Plus Some of the Latest Developments.” We
covered issues relating to a seeming alphabet soup of forms applicable
to advisers (e.g., Treasury’s TIC Forms SLT and SHC, Bureau of
Economic Analysis BE forms, and SEC Form ADV). The Subcommittee closely
tracks developments and emerging trends in the private investment funds
industry.
For more information about, and how to join, the Securities
Regulation Committee and Private Investment Funds Subcommittee, go to
the website www.nysba.org/SecuritiesRegulation or www.nysba.org/PIF. We are also on LinkedIn at www.nysba.org/SecuritiesRegulationLinkedIn
or www.nysba.org/PIFLinkedIn.
-- Howard B. Dicker, Chair
Winter 2011 NY Business Law Journal
Securities Regulation Committee
The Securities Regulation Committee has continued its monthly meeting
programs addressing a wide range of matters of importance to securities
law practitioners. Our dinner meetings tend to foster lively
discussions, and afford committee members an opportunity to discuss
“hot topics” with persons closely associated with them.
Since our last committee report in Summer 2011, among the topics
presented at meetings were the following:
1. Lessons to Be Learned from the Financial Crisis: A Focus on
Financial Regulatory Reform
2. An SRO for Investment Advisers
3. The New SEC Whistleblowers Rules: A Changing Landscape for Compliance
Programs
4. Trading Securities in Private Companies (like Facebook and
Twitter)
5. What Is Material Information? How We Can Learn From Securities
Litigation Experts.
6. Unsettled SEFs [Swap Execution Facilities]: Uncertainty under
Unfolding SEC and CFTC Regulations
7. Political Spending by Public Companies—Ripe for Regulation?
8. Proxy Access Shareholder Proposals for 2012—Let the Games
Begin
In addition, our Private Investment Funds Subcommittee has gotten off
to a great start since its inaugural meeting in March 2011. Its mission
is to closely track developments and emerging trends in the private
investment funds industry. The subcommittee will monitor the adoption of
new rules and regulations and pending proposals for reform. It will also
monitor the emergence of new industry standards and best practices in
respect to fund formation and operations. The subcommittee expects to
meet on a quarterly basis. We’ve had two meetings since March
2011. In June 2011, there was a presentation on “FCPA and UK
Bribery Act Enforcement for Asset Managers.” And in October we had
a presentation on “Investment Adviser Registration Rules and
Current SEC Initiatives—Dialogue with the SEC Staff,”
featuring the newly appointed branch chief of the SEC‘s recently
formed Private Fund Adviser Regulation Branch.
For more information about, and how to join, the Securities
Regulation Committee and Private Investment Funds Subcommittee, go to
the website www.nysba.org/SecuritiesRegulation or www.nysba.org/PIF. We
are also on LinkedIn (member only) at www.nysba.org/SecuritiesRegulationLinkedIn or
www.nysba.org/PIFLinkedIn.
---Howard Dicker, Chair
Summer 2011 NY Business Law Journal
Securities Regulation Committee
The Securities Regulation Committee has continued its monthly meeting
programs addressing a wide range of matters of importance to securities
law practitioners. Our dinner meetings tend to foster lively
discussions, and afford Committee members an opportunity to discuss
“hot topics” with persons closely associated with them.
Since our last Committee report in Summer 2010, among the topics
discussed at meetings were:
1. Corporate Governance and Risk
2. Fairness Opinions—Recent Cases and Other Developments
3. Financial Reform Legislation—an Insider’s View
4. Current Issues in Executing Capital Markets Transactions
5. FINRA Regulatory Notice 10-22: Obligation of Broker-Dealers to
Conduct Reasonable Investigations in Regulation D Offerings, plus other
developments
6. Reverse Mergers
7. Dodd Frank Act: (A) Investment Adviser registration and other
provisions affecting Hedge Funds and Private Equity plus (B) the
Corporate Governance & Executive Compensation provisions
8. Dodd-Frank Act: Derivatives provisions (that even non-derivatives
lawyers need to know)
9. After the Subprime Crisis: A New Era of Financial Reporting
10. “Proxy Access”
11. Recent 2nd Circuit decision involving SOXA 304 (clawback) and
indemnifi cation rights of the CEO and CFO
12. “Proxy Plumbing” & the SEC Concept Release
13. Hedge Fund Compliance: How to Avoid A Mess/FCPA Developments:
Bribery and Corruption
14. Trends in Financial Statement Fraud/Current Issues at the PCAOB
15. Professional Responsibility and the General Counsel
16. SEC proposal on Investment Adviser Registration
17. SEC proposal on Whistleblower provision in the Dodd-Frank Act
18. Activist Investors and Activist Investing
19. Information Security in the Practice of Law
20. 2010 Securities Enforcement Update and 2011 Outlook
21. M & A Disclosure Matters and Other SEC Considerations
22. Recent “Poison Pill” Developments
23. New Lobbyist Regulations’ Impact on Investment Managers,
Private Investment Funds, Placement Agents and Others
24. Dodd-Frank Act update and other developments for public
companies
In addition, the Private Investment Funds Subcommittee was formed.
Its mission is to closely track developments and emerging trends in the
private investment funds industry. The subcommittee will monitor the
adoption of new rules and regulations and pending proposals for reform.
It will also monitor the emergence of new industry standards and best
practices in respect of fund formation and operations. The subcommittee
expects to meet on a quarterly basis. Participants will include law-firm
and in-house practitioners representing both hedge fund and private
equity/VC fund managers and investors. The subcommittee’s
successful inaugural meeting was held on March 10, 2011, and had a
presentation on “Recent Insider Trading Cases and Enforcement
Activities.”
The Committee also submitted comment letters to regulatory
authorities on a variety of proposed rules (some of which implement the
Dodd-Frank Act):
• SEC: Disclosure Related to “Conflict
Minerals”
• SEC: Disclosure of Mine Safety Information
• SEC: Disclosure by Resource Extraction Issuers
• SEC: (i) Exemptions for Advisers to Venture Capital Funds,
Private Fund Advisers With Less Than $150 Million in Assets Under
Management, and Foreign Private Advisers and (ii) Rules Implementing
Amendments to the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
• FINRA: amendments to FINRA Rule 5122 to Address Member Firm
Participation in Private Placements
• CFTC: Commodity Pool Operators and Commodity Trading
Advisors: Amendments to Compliance Obligations
---Howard Dicker, Chair
Winter 2010 NY Business Law Journal Securities
Regulation Committee
Since our last update, the Securities Regulation Committee has
continued its monthly meeting programs addressing a wide range of
matters of importance to securities law practitioners. Our dinner
meetings tend to foster lively discussions, and afford Committee members
an opportunity to discuss “hot topics” with persons closely
associated with them. Among the topics presented at our recent meetings
were:
1. Corporate Governance and Risk
2. Fairness Opinions—Recent Cases and Other Developments
3. Financial Reform Legislation—an Insider’s View
4. Current Issues in Executing Capital Markets Transactions
5. FINRA Regulatory Notice 10-22: Obligation of Broker-Dealers to
Conduct Reasonable Investigations in Regulation D Offerings, plus other
developments
6. Reverse Mergers
7. Dodd Frank Act: (A) Investment Adviser registration and other
provisions affecting Hedge Funds and Private Equity, plus (B) the
Corporate Governance & Executive Compensation provisions
8. Dodd-Frank Act: Derivatives provisions (that even non-derivatives
lawyers need to know)
9. After the Subprime Crisis: A New Era of Financial Reporting
10. “Proxy Access”
11. Recent 2nd Circuit decision involving SOXA 304 (clawback) and
indemnification rights of the CEO and CFO
12. “Proxy Plumbing” & the SEC Concept Release
In addition, at the Business Law Section Fall Meeting, the Committee
sponsored two outstanding programs. The fi rst was “Trends in
Private Placements, PIPEs, Registered Directs, Confidentially Marketed
Public Offerings and Bought Deals.” We heard from an experienced
banker and a seasoned lawyer on the current techniques used by companies
to raise capital and how to navigate the issues. Then, in the
“Extraterritorial Reach of the Federal Securities
Regulation” program, we heard from a securities litigator and a
law professor/former SEC enforcement attorney on how the recent
Morrison Supreme Court decision overruled nearly 50 years of
accepted case law, and what that means to us. A lively discussion
ensued.
---Howard Dicker, Chair
Summer 2010 NY Business Law Journal Securities
Regulation Committee
The Securities Regulation Committee has
continued its monthly meeting programs addressing a wide range of
matters of importance to securities law practitioners. Our dinner
meetings tend to foster lively discussions, and afford Committee members
an opportunity to discuss “hot topics” with persons closely
associated with them. Among the topics presented at our recent meetings
were:
1. Proposed Amendment to SEC Rule 163(c), which would allow
underwriters of “well-known seasoned issuers” (WKSIs) to
contact investors prior to the filing of a registration statement
2. Expert Networks—How Hedge Funds and Other Investors Can Get the
Inside Track Legally (and how to avoid violating Rule 10b-5 and Reg
FD)
3. New Developments in Federal and Corporate Law, Shareholder Activism
and Annual Meeting Procedures, Loss of Broker Voting, Proxy Enhancement
Rules, and Proxy Access
4. New York’s Power of Attorney Legislation
5. Environmental disclosures and the recent SEC climate change risk
guidance
6. The SEC’s recent equity market structure initiatives, including
dark pools (i.e., trading systems for trading large blocks of stock
between institutions off-exchange and out of public view) and short
sales
7. Recent amendments to Regulation SHO, the new short-sale rule and its
implications
8. Developments in Investor Relations for Public Companies and
Alternative Asset Managers
—Howard Dicker, Chair
Fall 2009 NY Business Law Journal Securities Regulation
Committee
The Securities Regulation Committee of the Business Law Section has
had a robust series of meetings these past few months, especially in
view of the recent SEC initiatives and changes affecting the capital
markets. We have monthly dinner meetings, followed by a review of recent
developments in securities law and a program portion. At our June
meeting, Colin Diamond of White & Case LLP discussed “New
Media and Retail Shareholder Participation” and Eric Robinson of
Wachtell Lipton discussed “The SEC’s Shareholder Access
Proposals and Senator Schumer’s Shareholder Bill of Rights.”
In July, we moved to presentations regarding the implications of state
law developments to securities practitioners. Michael Allen of Richards,
Layton & Finger spoke about recent Delaware law changes, and Keith
Bishop of Allen Matkins Leck Gample Mallory & Natsis spoke about
developments in California law. In September, Robert Messineo of Weil
Gotshal discussed further developments in connection with the
SEC’s proxy access proposal, including the comments of the
American Bar Association, and Howard Dicker of Weil Gotshal discussed
the SEC’s proposals regarding proxy disclosure and solicitation
enhancements. Also at the meeting, Rhonda Brauer of Georgeson Inc.
discussed the recent report of the ABA Task Force on Delineation of
Governance Roles and Responsibilities. In October, Luigi De Ghenghi,
John Brandow and Reena Sahni of Davis Polk & Wardwell discussed
certain of the legislative and regulatory responses to the financial
crisis, and Matthew Kaplan of Debevoise & Plimpton spoke about
developments in insider trading and the SEC’s misappropriation
theory, focusing on the action brought by the SEC against Mark Cuban.
Looking forward, we are planning to have our November meeting hosted by
the New York Stock Exchange.
At our meetings we generally have an active and engaging dialogue
among the speakers and attendees regarding the discussion topics. We
have made continuing efforts to encourage younger attorneys to join the
Committee and to participate in its activities.
—Jeffrey Rubin, Chair
Fall 2007 NY Business Law Journal
Securities Regulation Committee
The Committee on Securities Regulation has continued its monthly
meeting programs addressing a wide range of matters of importance to
securities law practitioners. Among the topics presented at our recent
meetings were electronic proxy delivery, Moody’s reviews of
executive compensation and internal control disclosures, short sales,
"empty voting," the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s report on U.S.
capital markets, the Pink Sheets, and various SEC rule proposals. In
addition, the Committee submitted a comment letter to the SEC on its
proposed rules regarding the prohibition of fraud by advisers to certain
pooled investment vehicles, and the accredited investor standards
associated with certain private investment vehicles.
The Committee is currently drafting comment letters regarding a
number of new SEC rule proposals.
Our dinner meetings tend to foster lively discussions, and afford
Committee members an opportunity to discuss "hot topics" with persons
closely associated with those topics.
—Jeffrey W. Rubin, Chair
Spring 2007 NY Business Law Journal
Corporations Law and Securities Law
The Committees on Corporation Law and Securities Law met jointly at
the Section’s Fall Meeting, held at the Cranwell Resort in Lenox,
Massachusetts. The joint meeting has been the custom for the Fall
Meeting.
Present were: Janet Geldzahler, Robert Fine, Joseph Hansen, Glenn
Witecki, Gary Trechel, Robert Yellen, Jeffrey Rubin, Richard Gutman,
Edward Cohen and Frederick Attea.
Mr. Attea noted that the primary items covered by the Corporation Law
Committee during 2006 dealt with the continued work on a proposed
revision to the New York Not-For-Profit Corporation Law, efforts to deal
with consequences of the "Publication Bill" and providing "educational"
opportunities to members with CLE credit.
The revised NFPCL draft was presented to the Executive Committee of
the House of Delegates of the NYSBA earlier in June of this year. The
New York City Bar Association requested time to review the proposed
legislation and, accordingly, the Executive Committee of the NYSBA
Executive Committee suggested that the matter be deferred for this
reason. At press time the Corporation Law Committee anticipated
resubmitting the proposed revision for action by the House of Delegates
at the January 2007 meeting.
The other subject that occupied substantial Committee time was
proposed amendments to the Publication Bill which finally became law.
There was a general discussion regarding the "negotiations" between the
Committee and the Governor’s Office and other interested parties.
As finally adopted, the law did not contain many of the most onerous
provisions of the early version of the bill but there is still a
substantial desire to repeal the law entirely. Mr. Attea noted that a
bill was introduced or about to be introduced that would repeal the
publication law; however, the NYSBA legislative experts did not believe
that this bill would have any material support.
There was a discussion regarding the feasibility of joint projects
with the Corporation Law and Securities Law Committees. This would be
explored further. One example of such a project was the "director
majority vote" controversy that was being studied by a Subcommittee
chaired by Janet Geldzahler. She generally described the background
giving rise to the issue and the status of "majority voting" under
current Delaware and New York statutes.
Mr. Attea noted that the Securities Law Committee provided CLE credit
on a regular basis at its monthly meetings. The Corporation Law
Committee was trying to follow that practice. There was a broad-ranging
discussion regarding a need to establish closer ties between the
Committees of the Business Law Section and legislative subcommittees
that deal with legislation affecting matters covered by the
Section’s committees. The Business Law Section’s Legislative
Affairs Committee has been formed recently to make progress on this
front.
—Frederick G. Attea, Chair (Corporations Law Committee)
| Securities Regulation Committee Activity in Review, Securities Regulation Committee Activity in Review, Business Law Section, Committee, Securities Regulation |
|