NYSBA
Opinions 76-150
Ethics Opinion 076
Validity of Group Legal Service Programs under recent United States Supreme Court Decisions.

Ethics Opinion 077
Erection of public sign at site of proposed new office building.

Ethics Opinion 078
Improper for attorney to accept retainer from corporate client to represent employees in real estate transactions resulting from corporation personnel transfers.

Ethics Opinion 079
Judicial Ethics - Judges - avoidance of impropriety in relationship with relatives and former partner.

Ethics Opinion 080
Validity of Group Legal Service Program to handle grievance claims of dissident union members.

Ethics Opinion 081
Telephone and City Directory listings

Ethics Opinion 082
Partners or associates defending criminal matters in county where one associate is part-time assistant district attorney.

Ethics Opinion 083
Former association on announcement card; to whom may cards be mailed; publicity of opening office.

Ethics Opinion 084
Legal services to friends, corporate employees, other corporations.

Ethics Opinion 085
Designation as patent attorney on letterhead, announcements and their distribution.

Ethics Opinion 086
Announcement of labor relations law practice, but not referring to representation of management, is proper.

Ethics Opinion 087
Interest charges on delinquent accounts.

Ethics Opinion 088
Election Campaign Activities of Judicial Office Holders

Ethics Opinion 089
Publication of legal articles in newspapers and magazines

Ethics Opinion 091
Political Contributions

Ethics Opinion 092
A sign with lettering of over 3 inches in height is undignified and is advertising.

Ethics Opinion 093
Improper for lawyers to join labor union which includes non-lawyer members.

Ethics Opinion 094
Solicitation should be by campaign committees and contributions should not be unreasonable in amount.

Ethics Opinion 095
Law office accounting information supplied to a data processor.

Ethics Opinion 096
Improper for a lawyer to defend an appeal for a new client when a successful defense would be detrimental to the interests of a former client in a related matter.

Next