Skip Navigation   My NYSBA | | Join | Renew | Web Survey | FAQ | Online Store | About NYSBA | Contact | Site Map
New York State Bar Association
Professional Standards for Attorneys
Ethics Opinions
NYS Court System Web Site
NY Codes Rules and Regulations (NYCRR)
Legal Links of Interest
Legislation
Pro Bono Information for Attorneys
Charity Corps
Free Legal Research from LoislawConnect
Government and Public Interest Attorneys Resource Center
Join the Lawyer Referral Service
LPM Resource Guide to Vendors
Lawyer Assistance Program (LAP)
Member Benefits and Savings Programs
NYSBA/LoislawConnect CaseAlert Service
Non-resident Resources
Solo and Small Firm Resource Center
Jobs and Careers
CasePrepPlus
Revised Local Rules for U.S. District Courts SDNY & EDNY
Professional Services Guide
For the Media
Government Relations
Law, Youth & Citizenship
Lawyer Assistance Program
Lawyer Referral Service
Pro Bono Affairs
Conference of Bar Leaders
THE NEW YORK
BAR FOUNDATION
Connect with NYSBA
 
  
Advanced Search       Search Tips
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
Professional Ethics Committee Opinion

Opinion #15 - 10/25/1965 (6-65)

Topic: Appearance of Partnership

Digest: Improper for several attorneys who share a suite of offices to use a firm name and hold themselves out to the public as a partnership when they are not partners

Canon: None

QUESTION

May several attorneys who share a suite of offices use a firm name and hold themselves out to the public as a partnership when they are not in fact partners?

OPINION

The proposed arrangement would be improper. Canon 33 forbids lawyers to use false, misleading, assumed or trade names. The proposed partnership name would fall under this ban since it falsely suggests the existence of a partnership when there is none and in addition the name would be an assumed or trade name. See Opinion No, 607 of the Committee on Professional Ethics of The Association of the Bar of the City of New York.

 



Related Files
Appearance of Partnership (Adobe PDF File)