|
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATIONProfessional
Ethics Committee Opinion Opinion #28 - 03/10/1966
(16-65)
Topic: General Release by Minor Defendant
Digest: Counsel must determine if it is in best interest of minor
defendant to execute a general release to have criminal charges
dropped
Canon: None
QUESTION
l. Hay defense counsel, representing a minor defendant on a criminal
charge, properly and ethically advise the minor defendant and/or his
parents to execute and deliver their general releases to the complainant
under the following circumstances: (a) The complain ant has offered to
withdraw or consent to dismissal without prejudice of the criminal
charge conditioned upon receipt of such releases; (b) the releases are
intended to release the complainant from possible claims for damages
without payment of any moneys to the minor and/or the parents; (c) the
releases shall be delivered and the criminal charge withdrawn without a
compromise order to be made by the Court.
2. Would the situation be different whether or not the defense
counsel has been retained to represent the minor in a civil action as
well as the criminal case?
3. Is defense counsel subsequently subject to censure in the event
that the minor repudiates the releases and sues for damages upon his
attaining majority?
OPINION
If defense counsel is of the opinion that it is to the best interest
of the minor that the proceedings be dropped, either because the outcome
is unpredictable, or because he believes that the minor might suffer
irreparable injury from undergoing a criminal trial even though
acquitted, or for other cause, it would not be improper to advise the
minor and his parents to execute the releases. However, the withdrawal
of the complaint or dismissal without prejudice should be subject to the
approval of the Court in which the criminal charge is pending, (Opinion
No. 207, The Association of the Bar of the City of New York).
Furthermore, to deliver or advise the execution of a release by or on
behalf of a minor without complying with the requirements of Article 12
of the Civil Practice Law and Rules would be improper professional
conduct. (See Hatter of Shields, 16 App. Div. (2) 5O.)
Defense counsel should, of course, explain fully to the minor and
his parents that their respective rights and liabilities are and the
reasons for his advice. It makes no difference whether or not
defense counsel has been retained to represent the minor in the civil
action as well as in the criminal proceeding.
Related Files
General Release by Minor Defendant (Adobe PDF File)
|