Skip Navigation   My NYSBA | | Join | Renew | Web Survey | FAQ | Online Store | About NYSBA | Contact | Site Map
New York State Bar Association
Professional Standards for Attorneys
Ethics Opinions
NYS Court System Web Site
NY Codes Rules and Regulations (NYCRR)
Legal Links of Interest
Legislation
Pro Bono Information for Attorneys
Charity Corps
Free Legal Research from LoislawConnect
Government and Public Interest Attorneys Resource Center
Join the Lawyer Referral Service
LPM Resource Guide to Vendors
Lawyer Assistance Program (LAP)
Member Benefits and Savings Programs
NYSBA/LoislawConnect CaseAlert Service
Non-resident Resources
Solo and Small Firm Resource Center
Jobs and Careers
CasePrepPlus
Revised Local Rules for U.S. District Courts SDNY & EDNY
Professional Services Guide
For the Media
Government Relations
Law, Youth & Citizenship
Lawyer Assistance Program
Lawyer Referral Service
Pro Bono Affairs
Conference of Bar Leaders
THE NEW YORK
BAR FOUNDATION
Connect with NYSBA
 
  
Advanced Search       Search Tips
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
Committee on Professional Ethics

Opinion #231 - 02/25/1972   (2-72)

Topic: Partnership in two law firms

Digest: A lawyer may be a member of two law firms

Code:  DR 5-105 (D); Canon 9

QUESTION

May a lawyer be a member of two different law partnerships?

OPINION

There is no ethical objection to a lawyer being a partner in two distinct firms each practicing in a different area. Drinker, Legal Ethics, 204 (1953); N.Y. City 561 (1941).

Ethical problems relating to the firms involved in such dual participation may properly be met by the consent of lawyers in both firms.

The relationship to clients and the public would be governed by DR 5-105(D) which would be applicable to both firms and which provides:

"If a lawyer is required to decline employment or to withdraw from employment under DR 5-105, no partner or associate of his or his firm may accept or continue such employment."

For such arrangement to be proper there must be a valid reason for the participation in the two firms and one must not be used to accomplish what is forbidden to the other or to evade personal responsibility. Further, since this is an arrangement by lawyers for lawyers, it is most important that Canon 9 be observed and that even the appearance of professional impropriety be avoided. See, N.Y. City 431 (1939).



Related Files
Opinion 231 (Adobe PDF File)