|
NEW YORK STATE BAR ASSOCIATIONCommittee on
Professional Ethics Opinion #245 - 04/28/1972
(22-72)
Topic: Interviewing adverse witness
Digest: It is not improper for defense counsel in a criminal case to
interview a witness for the prosecution over the objection of the
District Attorney
Code: EC 6-4; DR 6-101(A); DR 7-102; DR 7-104
QUESTION
May the attorney for a defendant in a criminal case interview a
witness for the prosecution without the knowledge of, or over the
objection of, the District Attorney?
OPINION
It is not improper for an attorney or defendant in a criminal case to
interview a witness for the prosecution without the knowledge, or over
the objection of, the District Attorney. Failure to thoroughly
investigate and marshal the facts by defense counsel could be considered
a dereliction of duty. EC 6-4; DR 6-101(A). A lawyer may properly
interview any witness or prospective witness for the opposing side in
any civil or criminal action without the consent of the opposing counsel
or party, as a witness does not "belong" to any party. This does not, of
course, sanction any suggestion calculated to induce any witness to
suppress evidence or to deviate from the truth. DR 7-102. See also,
American College of Trial Lawyers, Code of Trial Conduct Section 15.
As prosecution witnesses are not parties nor clients of the
prosecution, ABA 101 (1933), the provisions of DR 7-104, prohibiting
conversations by a lawyer with a party represented by a lawyer unless he
has the prior consent of the lawyer representing such party, are not
applicable.
Related Files
Opinion 245 (Adobe PDF File)
|