 |
COMMITTEE ON
PROFESSIONAL ETHICS
Opinion 907 (2/2/12)
Topic: Protecting
anonymity of client
Digest: An attorney
may agree to make an anonymous donation on behalf of a client, and must
protect the confidentiality of the identity of a client when asked by
the client to do so, provided the request does not involve the lawyer in
prohibited conduct.
Rules: 1.4,
1.6(a)(3), 1.6(b)(6), 1.15(a), (b), (c), 4.1, 8.4(a),(b),
(c)
QUESTION
1. May an attorney may make a charitable
donation on behalf of a client and maintain the client’s anonymity
at the client’s request, and may the attorney use the
attorney’s escrow account to make the donation?
FACTS
2. The inquirer is an attorney whose client
seeks to make an anonymous donation to a charity. The client would like
to place the money in an escrow account under the attorney’s
control, and then have the attorney forward the payment of the donation
to the recipient. The client has instructed the attorney not to reveal
the client’s identity so that the client may remain
anonymous.
OPINION
3. Rule 1.6 bars lawyers from revealing
confidential information without client consent unless otherwise
authorized by the Rule. “Confidential Information” is
defined in Rule 1.6(a)(3) as follows:
“Confidential information” consists of
information gained during or relating to the representation of a
client, whatever its source, that is (a) protected by the
attorney-client privilege, (b) likely to be embarrassing or detrimental
to the client if disclosed, or (c) information that the client has
requested be kept confidential. “Confidential
information” does not ordinarily include (i) a lawyer’s
legal knowledge or legal research or (ii) information that is generally
known in the local community or in the trade, field or profession to
which the information relates. (Emphasis added.)
4. The attorney has a duty under Rule
1.6(a) (3)(c) to follow the client's direction because the
client’s identity in making an anonymous donation is
“information that the client has requested be
kept confidential.” The attorney must
therefore maintain the confidentiality of the information unless
authorized or required to disclose it.
5. That protecting the identity of a client
who has not consented to disclosure is an attorney's duty has previously
arisen before for this Committee, under the Code of Professional
Responsibility in effect prior to April 1, 2009. In N.Y.
State 645(1993), this Committee addressed the conflict between legally
mandated disclosure obligations and the attorney’s duty to protect
a client’s identity. Specifically, N.Y. State 645 “discusses
the obligations of a lawyer who contemplates accepting a position that
might involve the disclosure of certain information about the lawyer's
clients — the name of the client and, implicitly, the fact of the
representation….” The Committee applied DR 4-101(B)
requiring an attorney to protect “confidences” and
“secrets.”
6. The request for anonymity and the duty
to protect information the client request to be kept confidential, does
not alone allow the attorney to make the donation if it were unlawful to
do so. The attorney must be careful not to mislead as to the identity of
the donor, for example by identifying the donor as the lawyer’s
trust account. Rule 4.1 bars attorneys from knowingly making a
false statement of fact or law to a third person. Rule
8.4(b) prohibits engaging in “illegal conduct that adversely
reflects on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a
lawyer.” Rule 8.4(c) prohibits “conduct involving
dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation.” The
inquirer has not presented us with any specific reason to believe that
unauthorized disclosure of the client’s identity could be legally
mandated here, but it is not difficult to imagine that the donor’s
identity may be required to ensure that the donation is lawful (e.g., is
not from an improper foreign source, does not evade disclosure or
donation limits, etc.). Rule 1.6(b)(6) permits lawyers to make
disclosures when required to do so by law.[1]
7. Because circumstances may arise that
require the attorney to make a disclosure of the client’s
identity, the attorney should make sure that the client understands that
the attorney may not be able to keep his identity secret and that the
client still wants to go ahead with the donation knowing the
risk. See Rule 1.4(b) (“A lawyer shall explain a
matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make
informed decisions regarding the
representation”).
8. Whether the attorney may use his escrow
account in connection with the proposed anonymous donation invokes Rules
1.15(a) and (b). Rule 1.15 provides for a trust account
holding “funds belonging to another person incident to the
lawyer’s practice of law…". In view of the use of the word
client in this question we assume that the making of the donation is
incident to the practice of law. (If that were not the case, it
may be necessary for the attorney to set up a separate account to
receive the funds and make the donation. See Comment [5] to Rule
1.15.) In general, the attorney must receive the client’s funds
into an attorney trust or escrow account and not commingle the funds
with the attorney’s own funds or the funds of any other
client. Rule 1.15(c) requires the attorney to provide the client a
receipt and to maintain appropriate books and records. As
discussed above, to avoid misleading the recipient, the lawyer must make
sure that the recipient knows that the donation is anonymous, and not
actually from the lawyer.
CONCLUSION
9. A lawyer has a duty to maintain the
confidentiality of a client’s identity at the request of the
client, and provided the lawyer does not knowingly make any false
statement and segregates the client funds in a properly documented
attorney escrow account, the lawyer may use the lawyer’s escrow
account for the purpose of making an anonymous charitable donation on
behalf of the client, provided the lawyer has satisfied himself that the
contemplated donation is not illegal or otherwise prohibited by
law.
(15-11)
[1]
See also, e.g., Association of the Bar of the City of New York,
Reforming New York State’s Financial Disclosure Requirements For
Attorney-Legislators: Report On Legislation By The Committee On State
Affairs, The Committee On Government Ethics And The Committee On
Professional Responsibility, dated January 2010, available
at http://www.nycbar.org/pdf/report/uploads/20071850-ReformingNYSFinancialDisclosureRequirements.pdf. In pertinent part, the report stated
that “[w]hile “information” may
include the identity of a client, courts have found that revealing
client identities does not breach ethical obligations because attorneys
may be obligated or permitted by law to provide this
information.” Id., citing U.S. v. Legal Services for New York City, 100 F. Supp 2d 42, 47 (D.D.C. 2000).
“Indeed,” the report
continues, “Rule 1.6(b)(6) permits a
lawyer to reveal information when required to comply with a law and
courts have noted that such a legal obligation would override any
claimed ethical duty of secrecy to a client.” Id.,
citing U.S. v. Hunton &
Williams, 952 F. Supp. 843, 856 (D.D.C.
1997).
Related Files
Ethics Opinion 907 (Adobe PDF File)
|