September/October 2013 Volume 55, No. 5
Future of Law - Hon. Randolph F. Treece, U.S. Magistrate Judge for the Northern District of New York, conducts a swearing-in ceremony for the 187 new students who comprise the Albany Law School Class of 2016. The ceremony, which concluded three days of orientation, was held on August 16. (Photo by Melissa Batalin/Albany Law School.)
By Patricia Sears Doherty
President David M. Schraver has taken meeting the crisis in legal education and creating a practical vision for the future of the profession as the lynchpin of his tenure—and he is moving fast to put his plan into action.
For instance, Schraver has breathed new vigor into the mission of the State Bar’s Committee on Legal Education and Admission to the Bar (LEAB), which was formed in 1952. Today, “this little committee that never received much attention,” as one of its
co-chairs characterized it recently, is front and center on the State Bar’s priority programming.
“Our mission is to understand the changes happening all around us in the profession and help today’s lawyers—our members—deal with that changing profession,” said Schraver of Rochester (Nixon Peabody LLP). That mission has to begin with the education
of law students—who will be the State Bar’s future members and who will carry the profession’s principles and practices into the future.
In May, when he made the committee appointments that fall to each incoming president, Schraver added members to the LEAB, including a vice-chair, and gave it a new emphasis. He asked co-chairs Eileen D. Millett of New York City (Epstein Becker &
Green, P.C.) and Eileen R. Kaufman of Central Islip (Touro College School of Law) and Vice-chair Ian Weinstein of New York City (Fordham University School of Law) to focus the committee’s work on finding concrete proposals for changing how law students
are educated and admitted to the bar. They have moved rapidly to help Schraver shape an active agenda.
“We all understand the crisis,” said Kaufman. “Our goal is to see if our committee can recommend some constructive, concrete proposals for change that the bar leadership will endorse.” She acknowledged that the shrinking job market, coupled with law
students crippled with huge debt require “solutions that are multi-faceted.”
Millett noted that “the State Bar is uniquely suited to educating practitioners about their profession, bringing together all of the stakeholders—academia, the bench, the bar and the board of law examiners to recommend effective policy change.”
The crisis in legal education is on the minds of lawyers and leaders around the country. During his education bus tour of upstate New York last month, President Barack Obama suggested that the law school model be changed from three years of study to
The State Bar’s committee is studying alternatives to the current legal education model and to licensing, but has not weighed in on a two-year curricula.
Among the issues the committee has been exploring are whether skills training should be required for licensing, whether early administration of the bar exam makes sense, and to what extent licensing can and should be linked to a performance-based curriculum.
Schraver’s agenda for moving the legal education discussion forward is ambitious. He is planning events that will provide a year-long conversation among several constituencies within the State Bar that will shape a new vision for the future of the profession.
1. Read all about it: The September issue of the State Bar Journal is devoted to legal education, with articles written by national figures, academics and leading statewide legal thought leaders. [See “A bold new world for educating lawyers”]
2. Talk through the suggestions. Although the State Bar’s Annual Meeting is still four months away, Schraver and the LEAB already are working on one of two panel discussions at the Presidential Summit, tentatively titled, “A Watershed Moment for
the American Bar: Can Lawyers, Employers, Regulators and Educators Come Together to Address Our Challenges?”
William M. Sullivan, founding director of Educating Tomorrow’s Lawyers at the Institute for the Advancement of the American Legal System at the University of Denver, will deliver the keynote address. American Bar Association (ABA) President James R.
Silkenat will be the discussion moderator.
Phoebe Haddon, dean of the University of Maryland School of Law, Hon. Jenny Rivera, New York State Court of Appeals associate judge, and Kent Syverud, dean of the Washington University School of Law, have signed on as panelists.
3. Identify what is needed. Schraver is working closely with Millett and Kaufman and the committee, as well as members of the New York State Judicial Institute on Professionalism in the Law and others to develop a conclave on the topic in the
spring of 2014.
“Different constituencies may have very different views of the state of legal education,” Schraver said. “I want us to bring out those different views, because we need to understand them and then figure out how to move forward and address a plan for
He expects a report will be the end result of the conclave discussions.
“I hope to educate our members and to lay a foundation for the New York State Bar Association to be meaningfully involved in the discussion,” said Schraver. “I want NYSBA to be a leader not only in New York, but also nationally.”
Then what happens?
In the spirit of collaboration between several past presidents, Schraver and President-elect Glenn Lau-Kee, the State Bar will continue the discussion, implementing any recommendations identified during Schraver’s term and building on that research for
Lau-Kee’s presidency that begins June 1, 2014.
The action list is ambitious, but still only a piece of the agenda that is being introduced on a national stage. Schraver and other State Bar leaders have been deep in discussion for some time with the ABA on the education crisis, especially with Silkenat.
Silkenat is the first New Yorker to lead that organization since Robert MacCrate, who is credited with calling the profession to arms on education with the 1992 ABA “MacCrate Report.”
The ABA’s Task Force on the Future of Legal Education plans to release its report soon. A working paper from the committee recently cited several potential recommendations.
Key themes identified by the task force include: the need for a systematic (rather than a tactical) approach to the deficiencies of law school financing and pricing; greater heterogeneity in law schools and legal education programs; focusing on the delivery
of value and on the development of competence in law school graduates.
The working paper also noted “the profound importance of cultural change, particularly on the part of law faculty.” Other themes noted are the need for changes in regulation of legal services, institutionalizing the process for assessment and how well
legal education prepares students for practice.
Schraver said the State Bar will take those recommendations seriously and work to modify some of them to fit New York’s unique professional landscape.
He also is working with the State Bar’s CLE Department to create programming that will help members understand and deal with changes in the legal profession and the increasing complexities in the practice of law. Schraver said the State Bar also will
study factors impacting the practice of law, such as changes in technology, new vendors of law-related services and the increasing use by the public of law-related services on the Internet.
Sears Doherty is State Bar News editor.